Calcutta High Court Grants Adjournment for Company's Winding-Up Petition Transfer The High Court of Calcutta granted the company's request for an adjournment, allowing them to apply for the transfer of the winding-up petition to the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Calcutta High Court Grants Adjournment for Company's Winding-Up Petition Transfer
The High Court of Calcutta granted the company's request for an adjournment, allowing them to apply for the transfer of the winding-up petition to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The Court considered the challenges faced by the company in obtaining a necessary no objection certificate and the legal interpretation of section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013. The next hearing was scheduled for July 15, 2019, reflecting a balanced approach that addressed both the company's difficulties and procedural fairness in the proceedings.
Issues: Difficulty in obtaining no objection certificate, Transfer of winding up petition to NCLT, Interpretation of section 434 of Companies Act, 2013
The judgment delivered by the High Court of Calcutta addresses several key issues. Firstly, the Court notes that the company, represented by Mr. Chakraborty, is facing challenges in obtaining a no objection certificate from their former advocate. On the other hand, the petitioning creditor, represented by Mr. Mukherjee, highlights a previous order where an adjournment was granted on the condition that the Court would proceed ex parte if the necessary authorization was not obtained. Mr. Mukherjee presses for an ex parte hearing in light of this situation.
In response to a query from the Court, Mr. Chakraborty expresses the company's intention to apply for the transfer of the winding up petition to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). He relies on a judgment from the Supreme Court regarding the interpretation of section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013, specifically emphasizing the last proviso in subsection (1) of the said section. The company raises a legal point that has been hindered by technicalities, seeking one last opportunity for adjudication, which is granted through an adjournment based on the notice issued in the previous order.
Ultimately, the Court grants the company's request for an adjournment and schedules the next hearing for July 15, 2019, as requested by Mr. Chakraborty. The judgment reflects a balanced approach in considering the challenges faced by the company in obtaining necessary documentation and the legal interpretation of relevant provisions under the Companies Act, 2013, while ensuring procedural fairness in the proceedings.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
