Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the relevant period, freight and transportation charges from the factory to the depot were includible in the assessable value when the depot was not a place of removal under the amended valuation regime.
Analysis: The relevant valuation depended on the statutory definition of "place of removal" and Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. For the period in dispute, the definition covered the factory, another place of production or manufacture, and a warehouse or other permitted place of deposit without payment of duty. It did not include a depot or premises from which goods were sold after clearance from the factory. On that footing, the assessable value had to be determined at the time and place of removal, and transportation from the factory to the depot was not part of such value. The view was consistent with the earlier decisions relied upon, which held that freight up to the depot was not includible where the depot was outside the statutory definition of place of removal.
Conclusion: The transportation cost from the factory to the depot was not includible in the assessable value. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the depot is not within the statutory definition of "place of removal" for the relevant period, freight from the factory to the depot is not part of the assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944.