Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned assessment order and consequential attachment were liable to be set aside for fresh assessment after considering the audit report in Form WW under Section 63-A of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.
Analysis: The matter was covered by earlier decisions of the Court on the same principle. The audit report in Form WW had already been filed along with payment of the penalty for belated submission. In that backdrop, the assessment required reconsideration on the basis of the audit report, with a fresh opportunity for personal hearing, and the consequential attachment could not survive once the assessment was set aside.
Conclusion: The impugned assessment order was set aside and the respondent was directed to redo the assessment afresh after taking into account the audit report in Form WW and after affording an opportunity of personal hearing; the consequential attachment order also stood set aside.