Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a shareholder's short-term loan of Rs. 1,00,000 could be treated as "loan capital" for the purpose of computing the capital base under section 109(iii)(4) and deciding the applicability of section 104 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The expression "loan capital" in section 109(iii)(4) was held to denote a commercial concept distinct from an ordinary loan simpliciter. The words "loan capital which is the property of the shareholders" were read as requiring borrowings from shareholders to have the character of capital, ordinarily represented by fixed-term arrangements such as debentures, mortgages, or loan stock, and not short or medium-term borrowings. A mere shareholder loan raised on the last day of the accounting year, without a fixed term and with repayment after a few years, did not satisfy that description. The Court also held that a construction treating any shareholder loan as loan capital would make the statutory language redundant and would defeat the object of section 104.
Conclusion: The Rs. 1,00,000 shareholder loan was not "loan capital" within section 109(iii)(4), and the answer to question 1 was against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.