Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisional challenge to the Tribunal's order could be entertained and whether electrical meters purchased for installation at consumers' premises qualified as electrical equipment used in the distribution of electricity so as to attract concessional tax treatment under the CST regime.
Analysis: The scope of revision was confined, and points not urged and decided before the Tribunal could not be raised for the first time in revision. On merits, the Tribunal had examined the settled law and found that electrical meters installed at consumers' premises for recording the quantum of electrical energy supplied are electrical equipment required for distribution of electricity. Such goods therefore fell within the statutory dispensation enabling concessional treatment under section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The Court found no infirmity in that conclusion and also found the delay explanation unsatisfactory.
Conclusion: The revisional challenge failed, the assessment of the electrical meters under the concessional CST provision was upheld, and the petitions were dismissed.
Final Conclusion: The order of the Tribunal was left undisturbed and the Revenue's challenge did not succeed.
Ratio Decidendi: In revision, new issues not urged or decided below cannot be entertained, and electrical meters used for recording and facilitating supply of electricity qualify as equipment used in distribution of electricity for concessional treatment under the CST Act.