Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was liable to be quashed for violation of the principles of natural justice and non-application of mind, and whether the matter should be remanded for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The assessment was based on alleged suppression of purchases and excess input tax credit. The petitioner was not afforded a personal hearing, and the order was passed without conducting an independent enquiry or cross-verifying the transactions with the other end dealer. In these circumstances, the assessment proceedings were found to be vitiated by breach of natural justice and lack of proper application of mind.
Conclusion: The assessment order was quashed and the matter was remanded to the assessing authority for fresh consideration after granting adequate opportunity, including filing of objections and personal hearing.