Mandatory pre-deposit limits tax appeal maintainability unless exceptional grounds justify waiver under the governing statute.

A statutory appeal under the Punjab Value Added Tax Act is maintainable only if the appellant complies with the mandatory pre-deposit condition. The Court stated that waiver is available only in exceptional situations, such as where the impugned order is void, without jurisdiction, or where legally recognised hardship is shown. Because the appellant did not deposit 25% of the additional tax and interest demanded, the appellate requirement remained unsatisfied and the appeal could not be entertained. The dismissal for non-deposit was upheld, and no question of law was found to arise.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appeal could be entertained when the appellant failed to deposit 25% of the additional demand of tax and interest as required under the statutory pre-deposit provision.

Analysis: The right of appeal under the Punjab Value Added Tax Act is subject to compliance with the pre-deposit requirement. The Court noted that such protection is not available routinely and can be considered only in exceptional cases where the impugned order is void or without jurisdiction, or where the assessee establishes hardship of the kind contemplated by law. Since the appellant did not deposit the amount directed by the appellate authorities, the statutory condition for entertaining the appeal remained unfulfilled.

Conclusion: The dismissal of the appeal for non-deposit of the mandatory pre-deposit was upheld and no question of law was found to arise.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory appeal is made conditional upon pre-deposit, the appeal is not maintainable unless that condition is satisfied, save in exceptional cases warranting waiver under the governing provision.

---