Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether tax was deductible under section 194-IA on the transfer of jointly owned immovable property where the sale deed was executed by a power of attorney holder and the consideration attributable to each co-owner was below the statutory threshold.
Analysis: The property was jointly owned, and the sale was executed by the power of attorney holder on behalf of the co-owners. The consideration for the entire property was Rs. 60,12,000, but in the absence of any contract to the contrary the consideration had to be apportioned equally between the two co-owners. On that basis, each co-owner's share was below Rs. 50 lakh, which is the threshold below which section 194-IA does not require deduction of tax. As the substantive applicability of section 194-IA failed, the demand raised for non-deduction of tax could not survive. The remaining grounds were rendered academic.
Conclusion: Section 194-IA was held not to be applicable, and the demand under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) was deleted in favour of the assessee.