Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-CE dated 01.03.2006 was available where the power project consisted of two generating units of 600 MW each and the combined capacity exceeded 1000 MW.
Analysis: The goods were supplied against the prescribed certificate and the only dispute was whether the project had to be treated as a single unit of 1000 MW or more. The project certificate issued by the Ministry of Power certified the Salaya Power Project as a thermal power plant of 1200 MW. The Tribunal also relied on the view that, for mega power project status, the relevant test is the combined capacity of the project and not whether a single unit alone crosses 1000 MW. Following the earlier decision on identical facts, the exemption could not be denied merely because the project comprised two units of 600 MW each.
Conclusion: The exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-CE dated 01.03.2006 was available to the appellant, and denial of the benefit was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: For a mega power project exemption, the combined capacity of constituent units is ative, and the benefit cannot be refused solely because no individual unit independently reaches the prescribed capacity threshold.