Court sets aside initial order, directs fresh assessment. Assessment Order canceled, fair opportunity denied. Independent determination ordered.

The Court set aside the initial order and directed a fresh assessment based on the correct schedule application. The Assessment Order was cancelled as it lacked proper reasoning and failed to provide the Petitioner with a fair opportunity to present objections. The Court instructed an independent determination of the taxability of cotton seeds used exclusively for seeding, disregarding previous clarifications and communications. The case was disposed of with a directive for a fair and independent evaluation in the fresh assessment, with no costs awarded.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to Clarification No.147 of 2005 and Assessment Order in TNGST No.1780326/2003-04.

Analysis:
The Petitioner, a registered dealer in various seeds treated for sowing, argued that the seeds become inedible due to commercial treatment and are only suitable for sowing. Initially classified under specific entries, the III Schedule was amended, leading to confusion. The Commissioner rejected a request for further amendment, leading to the issuance of Clarification No.147 in 2005, taxing hybrid cotton seeds at 4%. The Petitioner cited a prior case where similar seeds were deemed non-edible and exempt from tax under a different entry. The Court set aside the initial order, directing a fresh assessment based on the correct schedule application.

The Respondents contended that the amended III Schedule did not include the exemption for certified seeds, arguing that all oil seeds are taxable under the II Schedule. Referring to past judgments, they emphasized that certain seeds, like groundnut, fall under the category of oil seeds for taxation purposes. The Respondents highlighted that the entry does not differentiate between oil seeds used for seeding and other purposes.

Upon review, the Court found that the Commissioner's decisions lacked proper reasoning and failed to provide the Petitioner with a fair opportunity to present objections. The Assessment Order was issued without considering the Petitioner's submissions, necessitating its cancellation. The Court directed a fresh assessment, instructing the Assessing Officer to disregard previous clarifications and communications. The Officer was tasked with independently determining the taxability of cotton seeds used exclusively for seeding within a specified timeframe, without influence from previous judgments.

In conclusion, the Writ Petition was disposed of with the directive for a fresh assessment, emphasizing fairness and independent evaluation. No costs were awarded, and the related Miscellaneous Petition was closed.

---