Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment framed under section 168 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was invalid for joining persons other than the executors as assessees.
Analysis: The assessment related to income of the estate of a deceased person whose will had appointed executors and whose administration had not been completed. Under section 211 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, the executor or administrator is the legal representative of the deceased for all purposes, and section 2(29) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 adopts the meaning of legal representative from section 2(11) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Since the executors alone were legally entitled to represent the estate, the inclusion of other persons as legal representatives had no statutory basis. The Court rejected the view that such inclusion was justified as a matter of abundant caution, holding that a person not legally liable to be assessed cannot be made an assessee merely by precaution.
Conclusion: The joinder of persons other than the executors was not a mere irregularity but vitiated the assessment, and the question was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: In an assessment of a deceased person's estate, only those who are legally competent to represent the estate may be assessed as representative assessees, and the inclusion of a person with no statutory liability is a substantive defect that invalidates the assessment.