Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 54F of the Income-tax Act, 1961, when she had a share in a residential property bequeathed under a will but mutation in revenue records had not yet been effected.
Analysis: The exemption under section 54F is unavailable if, on the relevant date, the assessee owns a residential house other than the new asset. The dispute turned on whether the Jor Bagh property had vested in the assessee as a completed bequest. The will had been probated, the executors had administered the estate, and the conduct of the executors and legatees showed assent to the disposition. Under the Indian Succession Act, the executor represents the estate until administration is completed, but title to a specific bequest passes on assent, which may be express or implied. Mutation in Land and Development Office records was treated as evidentiary and not constitutive of ownership. The demand for unearned increase by the lessor did not prevent completion of the bequest in favour of the assessee, and the property had already been distributed for the purposes of title.
Conclusion: The assessee was the owner of the residential property at Jor Bagh for the purpose of section 54F and was not entitled to the exemption.