Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether CENVAT credit was admissible on M.S. plates, bars, angles, tors, channels and sheets used for installation and foundation work, though such items were not covered within the definition of capital goods under Rule 2(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.
Analysis: The dispute concerned steel items used in the factory for laying foundations and supporting machinery. Relying on the larger Bench ruling in Mangalam Cement Ltd. and the decision of the High Court in Vandana Global Ltd., the Tribunal accepted that goods used for erection of foundations and installation of plant and machinery may qualify for credit where they are used in relation to manufacture and form an integral part of the capital goods. The reasoning proceeded on the basis that such items can fall within the scope of inputs or capital goods for CENVAT purposes when used in the factory in connection with manufacture.
Conclusion: CENVAT credit on the disputed iron and steel items was held admissible, and the disallowance was set aside.