Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sum of Rs. 2,70,593 realised on sale of machinery not used during the relevant previous year was liable to tax under Section 10(2A) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: Section 10(2A) applies only where an amount is received in respect of a loss, expenditure or trading liability for which an allowance or deduction had earlier been made. The depreciation allowance granted in prior years could, at most, be viewed as a capital loss suffered by reason of user of the asset. But the sale price received on disposal of machinery was not a receipt in respect of that earlier depreciation loss; it was a capital gain arising from realisation of an amount in excess of the written down value. The existence of a separate charging provision for profits on sale of depreciated assets also supported this distinction.
Conclusion: The amount of Rs. 2,70,593 was not taxable under Section 10(2A) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and the question was answered against the department.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 10(2A) is attracted only when the later receipt is referable to, or in recoupment of, an earlier allowance-related loss, and not when the receipt is merely capital gain on sale of an asset.