Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the prosecution material disclosed the requisite knowledge or reason to believe, as required for an offence under Section 489B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, so as to justify continuation of the criminal proceedings.
Analysis: Section 489B requires mens rea, namely that the person uses, receives, sells, buys, or traffics in counterfeit currency knowing or having reason to believe it to be counterfeit. Mere possession or deposit of counterfeit notes is not enough unless the prosecution materials show that the accused had the necessary knowledge. The currency notes in question were treated as high quality counterfeit notes, and the material collected did not disclose any basis to attribute knowledge to the petitioner. In such circumstances, continuation of the prosecution would amount to abuse of process, and the Court was entitled to exercise inherent power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Conclusion: The proceedings were quashed because the essential element of knowledge was not made out against the petitioner.