Pre-existing dispute bars section 9 insolvency admission where a real and plausible contention existed before the demand notice.

A pre-existing dispute can bar admission of a section 9 insolvency application where the record shows a real and plausible contention requiring further investigation. The definition of dispute under section 5(6) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is inclusive and extends to suits or arbitration concerning the debt, quality of goods or services, or breach of representation or warranty. Here, the respondent had already challenged the settlement agreements before a civil court and had raised the controversy before issuance of the demand notice under section 8, so a prior dispute existed and the section 9 application was not maintainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the existence of a pre-existing dispute between the parties barred admission of the application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Analysis: The definition of dispute under section 5(6) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is inclusive and covers a suit or arbitration proceeding relating to the existence of the amount of debt, quality of goods or services, or breach of representation or warranty. The dispute standard is to be understood broadly, and the adjudicating authority at the admission stage is required to see whether there is a real and plausible contention requiring further investigation, not whether the defence will ultimately succeed. On the record, the respondent had already challenged the settlement agreements before the civil court and had raised the controversy prior to the issuance of the demand notice under section 8.

Conclusion: A pre-existing dispute was held to exist, and the section 9 application was not maintainable.

---