Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether Mandir, Gaushala and Dharmada payments were allowable deductions; (ii) whether expenditure incurred on renovation of bath rooms, urinals and gates was deductible under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Issue (i): Whether Mandir, Gaushala and Dharmada payments were allowable deductions.
Analysis: The questions stood covered by prior binding authority approving the view that such payments are deductible as business expenditure.
Conclusion: The payments were allowable, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether expenditure incurred on renovation of bath rooms, urinals and gates was deductible under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The expenditure was incurred in rented premises occupied for a long period, and the work consisted of renovation and minor fitting changes. On the facts found, no new asset came into existence and no asset of an enduring nature was brought into existence.
Conclusion: The expenditure was admissible as a deduction, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: All the questions were answered in favour of the assessee, resulting in acceptance of the assessee's claim on both the covered and factual issues.
Ratio Decidendi: Expenditure incurred on renovation in rented premises is deductible where it does not bring into existence a new asset or an asset of enduring nature, and payments covered by binding precedent as business outgoings are allowable deductions.