Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's books of account were rightly rejected under section 145(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the estimation of gross profit at 8.45% was justified.
Analysis: The books were found unreliable because the stock record produced was not shown to be maintained in the regular course of business, the auditor's report itself recorded that quantitative details were not furnished, and the stock register did not distinguish between different qualities, types, or stages of processing of hides and skins. The Court treated these defects as material, holding that proper valuation and true trading results could not be deduced from the accounts. It further held that estimation based on the assessee's own past results was a reasonable method, and the rate adopted by the Revenue was not shown to be excessive or arbitrary.
Conclusion: The rejection of accounts under section 145(3) was upheld, and the estimation of income by applying a gross profit rate of 8.45% was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where books of account are not correct and complete, particularly because of defective stock records and unreliable valuation of trading stock, the accounts may be rejected and income reasonably estimated on the basis of material such as the assessee's own past profit results.