Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order and demand notice were liable to be quashed for violation of natural justice, particularly for failure to afford personal hearing before finalising the assessment.
Analysis: The assessment was made after issuance of a pre-assessment notice under Section 22(4) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, but the Court found that the assessee was not afforded sufficient opportunity in the manner required by the departmental circular and the governing procedure. The Court relied on the principle that personal hearing is mandatory where the procedure so requires, and that non-compliance with the prescribed opportunity before passing a speaking assessment order amounts to violation of natural justice.
Conclusion: The assessment order and demand notice were quashed. The matter was remanded to the assessing authority for fresh consideration after granting the assessee sufficient opportunity, including personal hearing.