Petitioner allowed to appeal assessment under Income Tax Act; conditions set for remittance and stay petition

The court allowed the petitioner to file a statutory appeal challenging the assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2016-17. The court directed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to consider the appeal without reference to limitation and dispose of it lawfully. A proposal was made for the petitioner to remit a specific amount to the Income Tax Department, leading to the lifting of bank account attachments and consideration of stay of recovery upon filing the appeal and remittance. The final order required the petitioner to comply with the specified conditions and for the Assessing Officer to consider the stay petition following Circulars issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.

---

---

Issues:
Challenging order of assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2016-17.

Analysis:
1. The petitioner challenges the addition made under 'unaccounted sales of unaccounted production of dairy products' without a show cause notice and proper consideration of submissions.
2. Disallowance under section 35(2AB) for expenditure on scientific research and development is contested, claiming entitlement to the deduction without the required statutory exercise by the Assessing Authority.
3. The petitioner's request for stay of demand was rejected, leading to attachment of bank accounts, impacting business operations significantly.
4. The respondent argues that the order of the Assessing Officer is correct, advising the petitioner to pursue appellate remedy for relief. The statutory appeal under Section 220(6) requires challenging the assessment through appeal before seeking a stay.
5. The court notes multiple hearings granted to the assessee before the assessment order was framed, rejecting claims of violation of natural justice principles.
6. The court allows the petitioner to file a statutory appeal within a week, directing the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to consider it without reference to limitation and dispose it lawfully.
7. A proposal is made for the petitioner to remit a specific amount to the Income Tax Department, leading to lifting of bank account attachments and consideration of stay of recovery upon filing the appeal and remittance.
8. The final order requires the petitioner to remit the specified amount, file an appeal within the given timeline, and the Assessing Officer to consider the stay petition upon proof of appeal filing and remittance, following Circulars issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes.

This comprehensive analysis covers the challenges raised, the court's observations, the respondent's stance, the court's decision, and the proposed resolution for the petitioner's compliance and relief.

---