Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in reassessment under Section 17 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, the Wealth-tax Officer could examine the assessee's claim for exclusion of an item already included in the original assessment.
Analysis: The reassessment jurisdiction under Section 17 is confined to bringing to tax escaped net wealth. Once an item has already been included in the original computation of net wealth and the assessment has attained finality, the reassessment stage does not permit the assessee to reopen that completed determination and seek exclusion of the same item. The Court followed the view taken by another High Court on the comparable reassessment scheme and held that the scope of reassessment cannot be enlarged to allow a fresh claim omitted at the original assessment stage.
Conclusion: The reassessment authority had no jurisdiction to consider the exclusion of the Rs. 5 lakhs item at the reassessment stage, and the question was answered against the assessee and in favour of the revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Reassessment under Section 17 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 is confined to escaped net wealth and does not permit reopening of completed assessment items for the benefit of the assessee where the item was already included in the original assessment.