Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Limitation periods clarified in tax assessment conflict, CST Act provisions prevail post-KVAT Act.</h1> <h3>BPL LIMITED Versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TAXES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ASSESSMENT), PALAKKAD AND THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD</h3> BPL LIMITED Versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TAXES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE ASSISTANT ... Issues:Assessment under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and Central Sales Tax (Kerala) Rules, 1957; Limitation period for assessments under the CST Act; Application of provisions of general sales tax laws post introduction of Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003; Conflict between limitation periods under CST Act and KVAT Act; Interpretation of limitation periods for assessment and re-assessment under CST Act.Analysis:The judgment concerns writ petitions challenging assessments and notices issued under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (CST Act) and Central Sales Tax (Kerala) Rules, 1957. The main issue revolves around the limitation period for assessments under the CST Act. The petitioners argued that the limitation period should be four years from the expiry of the year to which the tax relates, as per Rule 6(7) of the CST (K) Rules. However, the respondents contended that the limitation period should be five years, as per the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act), for completion of assessments under the CST Act.The court analyzed the provisions of Section 9(2) of the CST Act, which empowers authorities to assess, re-assess, and collect taxes under the CST Act using powers available under the general sales tax law of the state. The introduction of the KVAT Act led to changes in the provisions of general sales tax laws, particularly emphasizing self-assessment under Section 21 of the KVAT Act. The court noted that under the KVAT Act, re-assessment alone is contemplated, with a five-year period for initiating such proceedings under Section 25.The judgment discussed previous decisions like Parisons Food (P) Ltd. and C.T.O. v. Fijo Joseph, which imported the limitation period of five years under the KVAT Act for completing assessments under the CST Act. The court highlighted the need to address the conflict between the limitation periods of the CST Act and the KVAT Act, emphasizing the application of CST Act provisions and rules for assessments under the CST Act, even after the introduction of the KVAT Act.The court further examined the principles under Section 9 of the CST Act, distinguishing between regular assessment under the CST (K) Rules and self-assessment under the KVAT Act. It concluded that for inter-State turnover, regular assessment under Rule 6(5) of the CST (K) Rules is necessary, with a reasonable period for initiating proceedings.The judgment cited precedents like Madhya Pradesh Industries and Regional Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Indore v. Malwa Vanaspati & Chemical Company Ltd., to support the differential treatment in limitation periods for assessments and re-assessments. It emphasized the importance of finality in proceedings and reasonable timeframes for initiating assessments and re-assessments.Ultimately, the court set aside assessments and notices issued beyond the five-year limitation period for the year 2005-06, while allowing assessments within the limitation period to proceed. The judgment clarified the application of limitation periods for assessments and re-assessments under the CST Act, providing guidance for future proceedings and appeals.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found