Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to avail deemed Cenvat credit on invoices issued after deletion of Rule 12B of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier view on the same supplier and relied on the Board circular clarifying that even after omission of Rule 12B, goods lying with the firm could be cleared under invoice on payment of duty according to law. The record did not establish whether the goods covered by the invoices had been received by the trader prior to the relevant date or whether the registration and invoice issuance were otherwise invalid. In the absence of contrary findings, there was no reason to depart from the precedent.
Conclusion: The credit dispute was decided in favour of the appellant and the impugned order was set aside.