Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the denial of Cenvat credit availed on invoices issued after deletion of Rule 12B of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was sustainable, and whether the matter required fresh consideration.
Analysis: The credit was disputed on the footing that the traders issuing the invoices had lost the status to discharge duty liability after omission of Rule 12B. The Board circular clarified that goods lying with the trader prior to 09/07/2004 could still be cleared on payment of duty under invoice after omission of Rule 12B. The record did not show whether the goods covered by the invoices were received by the traders before 09/07/2004, and the validity of the excise registration relied upon by the appellant was also not examined. In the absence of findings on these material aspects, the orders below could not be sustained and the matter had to be reconsidered after giving due opportunity.
Conclusion: The orders of the lower authorities were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after following the principles of natural justice.