Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether directions should be issued to the provident fund authorities to consider waiver of penal damages under the sanctioned rehabilitation scheme and to deal with the pending attachment and recovery measures.
Analysis: The scheme approved under the sick industrial companies regime contained a specific provision to consider waiver of provident fund penalties and damages. The petitioner had already cleared the provident fund dues and interest, and the remaining demand related only to penal damages. Since the High Court had already directed the competent provident fund authority to consider the waiver request in accordance with law, and the request was stated to be pending or otherwise required to be resubmitted, the Tribunal found that the appropriate course was to direct expeditious consideration by the Central Provident Fund Commissioner. The Tribunal did not itself grant waiver, but required the competent authority to process the application and communicate its decision.
Conclusion: Directions were issued to the Central Provident Fund Commissioner to consider the petitioner's waiver request expeditiously if pending, or to inform the petitioner to file a fresh application and decide it in accordance with the sanctioned scheme.