Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Court orders interest on seized cash, treating it as advance tax under Income Tax Act. The court set aside the order rejecting the petitioner's claim for interest on seized cash, directing the respondent to pay interest at 6% per annum on ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court orders interest on seized cash, treating it as advance tax under Income Tax Act.
The court set aside the order rejecting the petitioner's claim for interest on seized cash, directing the respondent to pay interest at 6% per annum on the seized amount from specific dates. The court held that the seized cash was to be treated as advance tax, entitling the petitioner to interest under Section 244A(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Interest was awarded based on the character change of the seized cash, following the assessment order, with reference to relevant statutory provisions and case law.
Issues Involved: 1. Entitlement to interest on cash seized during a search operation. 2. Applicability of Sections 132B(4) and 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Detailed Analysis:
1. Entitlement to Interest on Cash Seized During a Search Operation: The petitioner sought relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, requesting the court to set aside the order dated 28th June 2018, which rejected their claim for interest on Rs. 35 lakhs seized on 9th October 2014. The petitioner also requested directions for the respondents to grant interest on the seized amount for specific periods.
2. Applicability of Sections 132B(4) and 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961: The facts of the case reveal that a search was conducted on 9th October 2014, and Rs. 35 lakhs were seized. The petitioner included this amount in their income for the Assessment Year 2015-16 and requested it to be treated as advance tax, which the Assessing Officer did not accept. The petitioner paid the additional tax demand raised by the Assessing Officer but sought a refund of the seized amount along with interest.
The Revenue's position was that since the assessment was completed under Section 143(3) and not under Section 153A, interest under Section 132B(4) was not applicable. Additionally, the Revenue argued that Section 244A(1)(b) did not apply as the Rs. 35 lakhs was seized and not paid as tax or penalty by the petitioner.
The court examined Sections 132B and 244A of the Income Tax Act. Section 132B(4) provides for interest payment on seized assets if the assessment is made under Section 153A or Chapter XIV-B. Since the assessment in this case was under Section 143(3), the court held that no interest could be granted under Section 132B(4).
However, the court noted that the petitioner had shown the seized cash as advance tax in their return, and the Assessing Officer's failure to adjust this amount as advance tax was unjustified. Consequently, the court held that the character of the seized cash changed to advance tax, making the petitioner eligible for interest under Section 244A(1)(b) from the date of the assessment order.
The court referred to the Supreme Court's decision in M/s. K. Lakshmanya Co. Vs. CIT, 299 ITR 657, which supports the interpretation that interest is payable on refunds of excess tax retained by the Revenue.
Judgment: The court set aside the impugned order dated 28th June 2018 and directed the respondent to pay interest at 6% per annum from 16th December 2016 to 31st May 2017 on Rs. 35 lakhs (before adjustment of penalty) and on Rs. 31.50 lakhs from 1st June 2017 to 7th March 2018. The payment was to be made within 12 weeks from the date of the judgment. The petition was allowed in these terms.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.