Exporters of taxable services allowed input service credit & SEZ turnover included in refund calculations under Rule 5

The Tribunal upheld the eligibility of input service credit for exporters of taxable services and ruled in favor of including SEZ export turnover in refund calculations under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The decision was based on established legal precedents and interpretations, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeals.

---

---

Issues:
1. Eligibility of input service credit for exporters of taxable services.
2. Inclusion of SEZ export turnover in computing the export turnover for refund claims under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

Analysis:
1. The respondents, exporters of taxable services, filed refund claims for unutilized cenvat credit on services provided under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS). The original authority partially rejected the claims, citing certain input services as not related to the output service. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appeals, stating the eligibility of input service credit and inclusion of SEZ export turnover in the proportionate credit calculation under Notification No.5/2006-CE. The department appealed against this decision.

2. The Revenue contended that as per a Tribunal decision, exporters are not entitled to refund cenvat credit on inputs used for services provided to SEZ units. They argued that the term 'export' under SEZ Act benefits only SEZ units, not DTA units. The export turnover for calculating proportionate credit should exclude the value of services provided to SEZ units. During the hearing, the Revenue reiterated their grounds of appeal.

3. On behalf of the respondent, it was argued that they are eligible for input service credit as availed during business activities. Reference was made to a Bombay High Court decision stating that business activities qualify as input services. They emphasized that SEZ export revenue should be included in both numerator and denominator for proportionate credit calculation. The Tribunal's decision in a similar case supported the inclusion of SEZ export value in export turnover.

4. After considering the arguments, the Tribunal found that the disputed issues were settled by previous decisions. Input services like Event Management, Clearing & Forwarding Agency service, and Insurance service were deemed eligible. It was established that SEZ export turnover should be included in computing export turnover for refund calculations. The Tribunal relied on the precedent set by the decision in Cognizant Technology Solutions case, where exclusion of SEZ export turnover was deemed unsustainable. Consequently, the impugned orders were upheld, and the Revenue's appeals were dismissed.

5. In conclusion, the Tribunal affirmed the eligibility of input service credit for exporters and the inclusion of SEZ export turnover in refund calculations under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The decision was based on established legal precedents and interpretations, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue's appeals.

---