Conditional release of attached assets and restoration of residential possession granted on deposit and monthly charges.

Attached movable properties were conditionally released because the valuation details were unclear and the appellants offered reasonable deposit values, with release made subject to payment within eight weeks. The residential house in the appellant's occupation was also restored on the basis that the family was residing there, the property would not be alienated pending disposal, and vacant possession served no useful purpose; restoration was made conditional on payment of monthly use and accommodation charges and arrears within the time fixed. The attachment order was therefore modified only to the extent of these conditional directions, while compliance with the deposit requirements remained mandatory.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the attached movable properties should be released on deposit of the values suggested by the appellants; (ii) whether the residential immovable property in occupation of the appellant and her family should be restored subject to monthly use and accommodation charges.

Issue (i): whether the attached movable properties should be released on deposit of the values suggested by the appellants.

Analysis: The valuation details of the movable assets were not furnished by the respondent with clarity. The appellants offered reasonable values for the vehicles and other movable properties, and the Court accepted that proposal as an interim arrangement. The release was made conditional upon deposit of the suggested amounts within the stipulated period.

Conclusion: The attached movable properties were directed to be released in favour of the appellants upon deposit of the amounts suggested by them within eight weeks.

Issue (ii): whether the residential immovable property in occupation of the appellant and her family should be restored subject to monthly use and accommodation charges.

Analysis: The materials placed on record indicated that the appellant and her family were residing in the house, and that they had been displaced after possession was taken. The Court accepted the undertaking that the property would not be alienated until final disposal of the appeals. Since no useful purpose would be served by keeping the house vacant, the Court permitted restoration of possession on payment of monthly use and accommodation charges and arrears within the fixed time.

Conclusion: The residential immovable property was directed to be restored to the appellant on payment of monthly use and accommodation charges and arrears within the time allowed.

Final Conclusion: The attachment order was modified by granting conditional release of the movable assets and restoration of the residential house, while preserving the attachment subject to compliance with the deposit directions.

---