Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after an assessment is set aside only on a limited point and remanded for fresh consideration, the assessee can raise a new plea in the reassessment proceedings based on a subsequent Supreme Court decision.
Analysis: The order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was construed as a partial remand confined to the specific issue of speculative losses. The earlier assessment on the receipt from sale of loom hours had not been appealed against on that point, and that issue had not been disturbed by the appellate order. In reassessment proceedings following a limited remand, the Income-tax Officer is bound by the scope of the remand and cannot travel beyond the matters remitted for reconsideration. The later Supreme Court ruling on loom-hour receipts did not enlarge the remand or reopen the concluded issue.
Conclusion: The assessee could not raise the new plea in the reassessment proceedings, and the question was answered in favour of the revenue.
Final Conclusion: A reassessment following a restricted remand is confined to the remitted matters alone, and issues not carried in appeal or not set aside remain concluded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an appellate authority sets aside only a specific part of an assessment and remands the matter for limited reconsideration, the reassessing authority has jurisdiction only within the remand directions and cannot entertain a fresh claim on a concluded issue.