Income-tax Officer exceeded authority in seeking de novo assessment without direction.

The court held that the Income-tax Officer exceeded authority by seeking a de novo assessment without specific direction. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner's order focused on the firm's registration status, not loss quantum. The officer was instructed to process the registration application, not conduct a fresh assessment. Without statutory basis, the officer's notice for a new assessment was deemed improper. The court issued a writ of prohibition, restraining the officer from conducting a de novo assessment, and awarded costs to the petitioner, including advocate's fee.

---

---

Issues:
Application for writ of prohibition restraining Income-Tax Officer from making de novo assessment.

Analysis:
The petitioner, a firm, was previously assessed as a registered firm but was later treated as unregistered due to failure to file an application for registration. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner set aside the assessment and directed the Income-tax Officer to consider the application for registration. The succeeding officer called for account books, leading to the petitioner's objection that no de novo assessment was warranted. The Income-tax Officer argued that the earlier assessment was nullified, necessitating a fresh assessment.

The Appellate Assistant Commissioner's order focused on the firm's registration status, not the quantum of loss. The officer was directed to receive the registration application and act accordingly. The court noted the wide powers of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner under Section 31 of the Act but emphasized that no specific direction for a de novo assessment was given. Without such direction and lacking statutory authority, the Income-tax Officer's notice for a fresh assessment was deemed jurisdictionally improper.

Consequently, the court held that the Income-tax Officer could only consider the registration application as directed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. Any attempt to conduct a new assessment on income or loss would exceed the officer's legal mandate. A writ of prohibition was issued, restraining the Income-tax Officer from making a de novo assessment. The petitioner was awarded costs, including advocate's fee.

---