Financial debt and continuing default can support insolvency admission despite parallel recovery proceedings and disputed calculations.

A financial debt and continuing default were established from the loan documents, guarantee papers, balance confirmations and account statements, showing disbursal against consideration for the time value of money and no repayment after default. Objections based on nondisclosure of one sanction letter, an alleged incorrect default date, limitation, and disputed interest computation did not displace the existing default or prevent admission; the later sanction letter and its cancellation could not erase an earlier default, and interest disputes were left to the insolvency process. Pending SARFAESI or other recovery proceedings also did not bar initiation of CIRP under section 7, so the application was admitted with moratorium and appointment of the interim resolution professional.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the debt claimed by the financial creditor constituted a financial debt and whether default was established for admission under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. (ii) Whether the objections based on alleged nondisclosure, incorrect date of default, limitation, and the subsequent sanction letter defeated the section 7 application. (iii) Whether pending SARFAESI or other recovery proceedings barred initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process under the Code.

Issue (i): Whether the debt claimed by the financial creditor constituted a financial debt and whether default was established for admission under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Analysis: The sanction letter, loan agreements, guarantee documents, balance confirmation, and account statements showed disbursal of loan facilities carrying interest against consideration for the time value of money. The materials also showed continuing non-payment from the date of default stated in the petition, with no repayment thereafter. The application was supported by the documents required under the prescribed form and the debt and default were apparent from the record.

Conclusion: The debt was a financial debt and default was proved.

Issue (ii): Whether the objections based on alleged nondisclosure, incorrect date of default, limitation, and the subsequent sanction letter defeated the section 7 application.

Analysis: The omission to place one sanction letter on record and the dispute regarding the exact date of default did not erase the continuing default. The subsequent sanction and its cancellation could not nullify an earlier default already in existence. The plea of limitation was rejected in view of the mortgage registration, subsequent payment, and extension of mortgage, which sustained the creditor's claim. The grievance regarding interest calculation was held to be a matter for the resolution process and not a ground to refuse admission.

Conclusion: The objections did not bar admission of the application.

Issue (iii): Whether pending SARFAESI or other recovery proceedings barred initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process under the Code.

Analysis: The existence of SARFAESI or debt recovery proceedings was held not to be a legal bar to a section 7 proceeding. The Code permits a financial creditor to invoke insolvency despite parallel recovery measures, and the pendency of such proceedings does not defeat the right to seek insolvency resolution.

Conclusion: Pending recovery proceedings did not preclude admission under section 7.

Final Conclusion: The application under section 7 was complete and sustainable, the corporate debtor's default stood established, and the corporate insolvency resolution process was admitted with moratorium and appointment of the interim resolution professional.

Ratio Decidendi: For admission under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, once a financial debt and default are shown from the record, objections regarding parallel recovery proceedings, alleged nondisclosure, or disputed calculations do not by themselves defeat admission unless they negate the existence of debt or default.

---