Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether execution of a general power of attorney on 29-05-2002 amounted to a transfer of the property for capital gains purposes, or whether the transfer took place only on execution of the registered sale deed on 20-11-2006, and whether section 2(47)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applied.
Analysis: The assessee executed only a general power of attorney in favour of the holder, without receiving any sale consideration and without handing over possession. The power of attorney merely authorised the holder to manage and sell the property and did not constitute a sale-cum-power-of-attorney arrangement. The essential ingredients for transfer under section 2(47)(v) or section 2(47)(vi), read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, were not satisfied because there was no consideration and no transfer of possession in 2002. The sale agreement and the registered sale deed in 2006 showed that the property was actually sold only when the sale deed was executed and the balance consideration was received.
Conclusion: The transfer was held to have taken place on 20-11-2006 and not on 29-05-2002. Capital gains were therefore chargeable in Assessment Year 2007-08, and the assessee's challenge failed.