Merger scheme sanction with revised appointed date to preserve tax scrutiny and compliance rights
A merger by absorption under sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 was sanctioned after the Tribunal found the scheme fair, reasonable, lawful, and supported by the reports of the Regional Director and Official Liquidator, together with the petitioners' undertakings on compliance, accounting treatment, and filings. The Tribunal also modified the appointed date from 1 April 2017 to 1 April 2018 because post-date transfer transactions concerning leasehold rights could affect Income-tax scrutiny of related tax liabilities, and the change was made to preserve the Revenue's statutory examination rights. The scheme was approved with directions including cancellation of inter se shareholding and dissolution of the transferor companies without winding up.
Issues: (i) Whether the scheme of merger by absorption under sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 deserved sanction; (ii) whether the appointed date of the scheme required alteration to protect the Revenue's right to examine post-date tax consequences.
Issue (i): Whether the scheme of merger by absorption under sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 deserved sanction.
Analysis: The scheme was examined in light of the reports of the Regional Director and the Official Liquidator, the undertakings furnished by the petitioners, and the compliance stated to have been made with the procedural and substantive requirements. The Tribunal found the scheme to be fair and reasonable, not violative of law, and not contrary to public policy. The objections regarding accounting treatment, filings, and statutory compliance were accepted with corresponding undertakings.
Conclusion: The scheme of merger by absorption was sanctioned.
Issue (ii): Whether the appointed date of the scheme required alteration to protect the Revenue's right to examine post-date tax consequences.
Analysis: The Tribunal noticed that certain transfer transactions concerning leasehold rights had occurred after the proposed appointed date and that keeping the appointed date as 1 April 2017 could prejudice the ability of the Income-tax authorities to scrutinize the tax liabilities arising from those transactions. To avoid dilution of the Revenue's rights, the Tribunal modified the appointed date.
Conclusion: The appointed date was changed from 1 April 2017 to 1 April 2018.
Final Conclusion: The amalgamation was approved with directions, including acceptance of undertakings, cancellation of inter se shareholding, dissolution of the transferor companies without winding up, and revision of the scheme's appointed date to 1 April 2018.
Ratio Decidendi: In proceedings for sanction of a merger scheme, the Tribunal may approve the scheme if it is fair, reasonable, and lawful, and may modify the appointed date where necessary to preserve statutory revenue scrutiny and other legal compliances.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
