Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether provisional attachment of the petitioner's bank accounts under section 45(1) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 could continue after final assessment orders were passed, and what protective directions were warranted to safeguard the revenue.
Analysis: Section 45(1) permits provisional attachment only during the pendency of assessment or reassessment proceedings, where such attachment is necessary to protect revenue. Once final assessment orders are passed, the authority must proceed under the recovery provisions of the Act if the assessed amount is not paid within the prescribed time. Continuation of provisional attachment after assessment is therefore not legally sustainable. At the same time, since the assessee invoked writ jurisdiction and the revenue's interest could not be ignored, limited safeguards were justified.
Conclusion: The continuation of the provisional attachment after the passing of the assessment orders was held to be bad in law and the attachment was directed to be lifted. The assessee was, however, subjected to protective conditions to secure the revenue.