Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Sections 3 and 4 of the Usurious Loans Act, 1918 apply to proceedings under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and whether an application for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process can be entertained or rejected on the ground of usurious or extortionate penal interest.
Analysis: The statutory scheme of the Usurious Loans Act, 1918 is confined to suits and insolvency proceedings before a court exercising powers akin to those under that Act. Proceedings under Sections 7 and 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 are not recovery suits and are not adjudicated by a civil court deciding money claims; the Adjudicating Authority acts in a limited insolvency jurisdiction focused on resolution. Since the Code contains a bar of civil court jurisdiction and the default inquiry under Section 7 is confined to the existence of debt and default, the Adjudicating Authority cannot invoke Sections 3 and 4 of the Usurious Loans Act, 1918 to reopen or test the loan transaction for excessive interest. Where the application is complete and debt and default are shown, the application must be admitted unless some other statutory infirmity exists.
Conclusion: The Usurious Loans Act, 1918 does not apply to Section 7 proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and an insolvency application cannot be rejected merely because the interest claimed is alleged to be usurious or extortionate.