Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to relief under Article 16(1) of the India-UK Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement and whether the matter required remand for verification of the tax residency certificate furnished for the first time before the appellate authority.
Analysis: The assessee was found to have rendered services in the United Kingdom and to be a tax resident there during the relevant year. The denial of treaty relief by the Assessing Officer rested on non-furnishing of the tax residency certificate during assessment proceedings. Since the certificate was produced before the appellate authority without a remand report from the Assessing Officer, the additional evidence required verification. In the interest of justice, the issue was restored to the Assessing Officer for the limited purpose of examining the tax residency certificate and granting relief if the claim was found to be correct.
Conclusion: The issue was remanded to the Assessing Officer for verification, and the revenue's appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.