Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether clearances of cement without RSP marking to industrial consumers qualified for concessional duty under serial No. 1(c) of Notification No. 4/2006 dated 01.03.2006, and whether such sales attracted the provisions of the Packaged Commodities Rules.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed earlier decisions holding that the character of the sale must be tested with reference to the statutory definition of retail sale under Rule 2(q) of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977. Where cement without RSP marking is sold directly to consumers and not through a retail sale agency or other intermediary instrumentality, the transaction does not answer the definition of retail sale. In such circumstances, Rule 3 does not govern the transaction in the manner suggested by the department, and the buyers do not lose the benefit merely because the goods were cleared to industrial users.
Conclusion: The impugned orders could not be sustained, and the appellants were entitled to the concessional treatment claimed. The appeals were allowed.