Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Revenue's Appeal on Re-Assessment Order

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the cancellation of the re-assessment order due to the absence of a notice u/s 143(2) after the notice u/s 148, as mandated by law. The Tribunal's decision was based on legal precedents and the specific circumstances of the case, resulting in the dismissal of the revenue's appeal.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of re-assessment framed by the ld AO without issuing notice u/s 143(2) of the Act.

Analysis:

1. Validity of Re-assessment:
The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal arose from the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) concerning the re-assessment framed by the ld AO under section 147/143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2011-12. The main issue in this appeal was whether the re-assessment was justified in the case of the assessee. The assessee had received a notice u/s 148 of the Act based on cash deposits in a bank account, which the assessee denied ownership of. The ld AO added the cash deposits to the assessee's income from undisclosed sources. The assessee objected that no notice u/s 143(2) was issued before completing the re-assessment proceedings, despite submitting a reply to the notice u/s 148. The ld CITA found that no notice u/s 143(2) was issued after the notice u/s 148, leading to the cancellation of the re-assessment as bad in law.

2. Notice Issuance Requirement:
The ld AO contended that as no return of income was submitted in response to the notices u/s 148 and 142(1), there was no need for a notice u/s 143(2). However, the Appellate Tribunal observed that the assessee's letter dated 14.11.2014, responding to the notice u/s 148, should be considered as a Nil return as per law. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee had effectively replied to the notice u/s 148, and the ld AO proceeded with re-assessment based on the reasons furnished. Citing a recent High Court judgment, the Tribunal held that the issuance and service of notice u/s 143(2) within the prescribed time is mandatory and non-compliance cannot be cured. Since no such notice was issued to the assessee, the re-assessment was deemed unsustainable in law, leading to the dismissal of the revenue's appeal.

In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal upheld the cancellation of the re-assessment order due to the absence of a notice u/s 143(2) after the notice u/s 148, as mandated by law. The Tribunal's decision was based on legal precedents and the specific circumstances of the case, resulting in the dismissal of the revenue's appeal.

---