Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the processes of bending, welding, buffing and hard anodizing undertaken on SS laser cut sheets amounted to manufacture so as to attract central excise duty on the intermediate product.
Analysis: The processes were carried out on goods sent by the principal manufacturer for job work. The intermediate product was returned to the principal manufacturer for further processing before the finished excisable goods emerged. On the record, there was no specific evidence to support the view that the intermediate product itself had acquired the essential character of the final excisable goods so as to be exigible to duty. In these circumstances, the definition of manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not satisfied on the facts found.
Conclusion: The processes did not amount to manufacture of a new excisable product, and the duty demand on the intermediate product was unsustainable.