Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Upholds CIT(A) Decisions on Commission Expenses & Section 54F Deduction</h1> <h3>ACIT, Circle-32, Kolkata Versus Jitendra Seth</h3> ACIT, Circle-32, Kolkata Versus Jitendra Seth - TMI Issues Involved:1. Disallowance of commission expenses of Rs. 51,56,694.2. Disallowance of section 54F deduction claimed of Rs. 56,52,242, restricted to Rs. 42,39,181.Issue 1: Disallowance of Commission ExpensesThe Revenue challenged the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]'s decision to reverse the Assessing Officer (AO)'s disallowance of commission expenses amounting to Rs. 51,56,694. The assessee, engaged in manpower recruitment, claimed these expenses as deductions. The AO disallowed the expenses on the grounds that the parties to whom the commission was paid denied using the services of the commission agents.The CIT(A) found that the assessee provided detailed evidence including the names, addresses, PAN details of the agents, bills issued, details of services rendered, and proof of TDS deductions. The CIT(A) criticized the AO for not examining the commission agents and failing to understand the business process, which involves discreet information crucial for placing senior-level executives. The CIT(A) concluded that the AO's inquiry with the candidates was irrelevant as the candidates might not remember the agents involved in their placement. The CIT(A) referenced several case laws supporting the allowance of commission payments as business expenses.The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s findings, noting that the AO did not verify whether the parties claimed the corresponding TDS credit in their tax records and did not investigate the assessee's ultimate clients. The Tribunal found that similar commission payments were accepted in subsequent assessment years, thus affirming the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the disallowance.Issue 2: Disallowance of Section 54F DeductionThe Revenue also contested the CIT(A)'s decision to reverse the AO's disallowance of the section 54F deduction claimed by the assessee for Rs. 56,52,242, which was restricted to Rs. 42,39,181. The assessee sold a property and invested in constructing a new building, which was sanctioned as both residential and commercial. The AO disallowed the entire deduction, arguing that the building's commercial nature disqualified it from section 54F benefits. The AO, based on an ITO's inspection, estimated the residential portion's cost at 15% of the total construction cost.The CIT(A) found that the building was primarily residential, with no commercial activities observed during inspection. The CIT(A) held that section 54F, being a beneficial provision, should be liberally interpreted. The CIT(A) determined that 75% of the building was residential and allowed the deduction accordingly, restricting it to Rs. 42,39,181 (75% of Rs. 56,52,242).The Tribunal supported the CIT(A)'s approach, agreeing that section 54F should be liberally construed. The Tribunal noted the assessee's fair declaration of the ground floor as commercial and the remaining floors as residential. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)'s apportionment of the deduction, treating the residential portion as 'a residential house' under section 54F.Conclusion:The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on both issues. The commission expenses disallowance was deleted, and the section 54F deduction was restricted to the residential portion of the new building.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found