Cheque dishonour proceedings may end on settlement and payment, reflecting the compensatory nature of Section 138 liability.
In a cheque dishonour prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the High Court noted that inherent and revisional powers under the Criminal Procedure Code may be used, with Section 147 of the NI Act, to accept a settlement and terminate proceedings where the complainant has been compensated. It stated that disputes of this kind are predominantly compensatory and may be brought to a close when the cheque-related liability has been substantially or fully satisfied, so that continuation of the prosecution would serve no useful purpose and the ends of justice are secured.
Issues: Whether the conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 could be interfered with and the proceedings given quietus on the basis of settlement and payment of the cheque-related amount.
Analysis: The Court relied on the inherent powers under Sections 397, 401 and 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, along with Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, to accept a settlement in a cheque dishonour matter. It applied the principle that proceedings arising from commercial or financial disputes with a predominantly civil flavour may be terminated where the complainant has been duly compensated and continuation would serve no useful purpose. The Court also noted the settled position that offences under Section 138 are primarily compensatory in nature and that, once the amount payable has been substantially or fully satisfied, the Court may secure the ends of justice by closing the proceedings.
Conclusion: The Court held that this was a fit case to modify the sentence and treat the matter as settled, since the compensation amount had already been paid.
Final Conclusion: The revision was disposed of by substituting the substantive sentence with the amount already paid and by directing release of the deposited balance to the complainant, thereby bringing the criminal proceedings to an end on the basis of settlement and satisfaction of the monetary liability.
Ratio Decidendi: In a cheque dishonour prosecution, where the complainant has been compensated and the dispute has been settled, the High Court may exercise its inherent and allied powers to modify or bring an end to the proceedings to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of process.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
