Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (10) TMI 1617 - HC - GST

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Petitioners allowed to distribute transitional input tax credit among branch offices under Section 140(8) CGST Act 2017 The Bombay HC ruled that petitioners could distribute transitional input tax credit available on July 1, 2017 among their branch offices with separate GST ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Petitioners allowed to distribute transitional input tax credit among branch offices under Section 140(8) CGST Act 2017

                          The Bombay HC ruled that petitioners could distribute transitional input tax credit available on July 1, 2017 among their branch offices with separate GST registrations under Section 140(8) of CGST Act, 2017. Due to technical issues preventing online filing and the October 20, 2018 deadline under Section 16(4), the court allowed manual filing of revised TRANS 1, ITC 01 and GSTR 3B forms. The petitioners were permitted to transfer credit from Mumbai to branches in Delhi, Gujarat and Karnataka, subject to jurisdictional commissioner approval. Petition disposed of.




                          Issues:
                          Transfer of Input Credit to GST regime, Technical difficulties in credit distribution, Entitlement to input tax credit, Time limit for availing credit, Extension of filing deadlines, Manual filing of forms, Inter-location credit transfer, Distinct person status for branches/locations, Jurisdictional Commissioner approval.

                          Transfer of Input Credit to GST regime:
                          The judgment addresses the issue of transferring Input Credit from the earlier CENVAT regime to the GST regime. It highlights a case where a business transferred a part of its operations and sought to carry forward its available Input Credit to the GST regime by filing TRANS-1. However, technical difficulties arose as the distribution of credit among branch offices was not reflected on the website, leading to the inability to utilize the credit in the GST ledger at branches. The judgment emphasizes the importance of transferring unutilized credit to the transferee in such cases.

                          Technical difficulties in credit distribution:
                          The judgment discusses technical challenges faced by businesses in distributing Input Credit among branch offices under the GST regime. It notes that despite the acceptance of revised TRANS-1, the system did not reflect the distribution, causing branches to be unable to utilize the credit for filing GSTR-3B. The court acknowledges the technical issues hindering the proper flow of Input Credit and emphasizes the need for resolution to ensure seamless credit utilization.

                          Entitlement to input tax credit and Time limit for availing credit:
                          The judgment clarifies that businesses are entitled to distribute Input Credit among locations as per Section 140(8) of the Act. It also highlights the importance of availing input tax credit before the specified deadline, as failing to do so could result in the lapse of credit. The court underscores the significance of complying with the provisions of the Act to safeguard businesses' rights to claim and utilize Input Credit effectively.

                          Extension of filing deadlines and Manual filing of forms:
                          The judgment mentions the extension granted for filing TRANS-1 and TRANS-2 but notes the absence of an extension for filing GSTR-3B. It emphasizes the need for businesses to manually file forms in cases where the system does not accept electronic submissions. The court directs the petitioners to submit physical copies of relevant forms to ensure the timely availment of Input Credit.

                          Inter-location credit transfer and Distinct person status for branches/locations:
                          The judgment addresses the issue of transferring credit from one location to another within the same business entity. It acknowledges that each registered location/branch is considered a distinct person under the Act, requiring approval from jurisdictional Commissioners for inter-location credit transfers. The court emphasizes the need for compliance with legal procedures and obtaining approval from relevant authorities for credit transfers between distinct locations.

                          Jurisdictional Commissioner approval:
                          The judgment highlights the importance of obtaining approval from jurisdictional Commissioners for transferring credits between locations. It stresses the need for satisfaction of the Commissioners overseeing different branches to ensure compliance with the law. The court grants liberty to apply for expedited processing of the petition, emphasizing the need for timely resolution of credit transfer issues.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found