Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether execution of the joint development agreement resulted in a transfer of the capital asset during the previous year relevant to assessment year 2006-07 so as to attract capital gains tax in that year.
Analysis: For capital gains to be charged under section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, there must be a transfer in the relevant previous year. The deeming provision in section 2(47)(v) applies only when possession of immovable property is allowed to be taken or retained in part performance of a contract of the nature referred to in section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The joint development agreement itself stated that the developer was given only permission to enter the property and that such authority was not to be construed as delivery of possession in part performance. The subsequent material also showed that legal possession was given later, which negatived the claim that a transfer had taken place in the relevant previous year.
Conclusion: There was no transfer during the previous year relevant to assessment year 2006-07, and the capital gains could not be assessed in that year. The addition was deleted and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.