Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Assessee's Appeal Allowed: Transfer Not Recognized, Capital Gains Assessment Deleted</h1> <h3>Dr. Krishna Prasad Mikkilineni Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Circle-3 (1) (2) Bangalore</h3> The Tribunal held that no transfer had occurred during the relevant year, leading to the deletion of the assessed capital gains for the assessment year ... Long term capital gain - JDA agreement - permissive possession v/s legal possession - Transfer of capital asset u/s 2(47) - assessee along with other co-owners has entered into Joint Development Agreement (JDA) for development of land belonging to them - assessee contended that he has not handed over the possession of the property as per the joint development agreementHELD THAT:- The assessee has given only permissive possession and not legal possession. Accordingly, following the said decision of M/S. ANUGRAHA SHELTERS (P) LTD. VERSUS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE-11 (1) BANGALORE [2021 (12) TMI 589 - ITAT BANGALORE] we hold that the transfer has not taken place during the year under consideration. Accordingly, capital gain is not assessable in the hands of the assessee during the year under consideration. Decided in favour of assessee. Issues Involved:1. Assessment of long-term capital gain.2. Applicability of Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act.3. Applicability of Section 2(47)(v) of the Income Tax Act.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Assessment of Long-Term Capital Gain:The assessee challenged the order dated 24.1.2018 by the Ld. CIT(A)-3, Bengaluru, which assessed a long-term capital gain of Rs. 65.77 lakhs for the assessment year 2009-10. The assessee filed a return of income on 29.7.2009 declaring a total income of Rs. 4,60,56,090/-. During the assessment proceedings, the A.O. noticed that the assessee, along with other co-owners, entered into a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) on 30.3.2009 with M/s. Arun Shelters Pvt. Ltd. for the development of their land. The A.O. computed the long-term capital gain at Rs. 65,77,117/- based on the decision by the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT Vs. T.K. Dayalu (2011) 202 Taxmann 531.2. Applicability of Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act:The assessee contended before the Ld. CIT(A) that he did not hand over possession of the property as per the JDA, thus the decision in Dr. T.K. Dayalu’s case would not apply. The Ld. CIT(A) disagreed and confirmed the addition made by the A.O. The assessee argued that only permission was given to the developer to enter the scheduled property, not possession, and relied on the decision in M/s. Anugraha Shelters Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITA No.2314/Bang/2016 dated 22.11.2021).3. Applicability of Section 2(47)(v) of the Income Tax Act:The Tribunal examined the clauses of the JDA, noting that the agreement granted the developer permission to enter and develop the property but explicitly stated that possession remained with the owners (Clause 11.1). The Tribunal referenced the case of Anugraha Shelters Pvt. Ltd., which distinguished between permissive possession and legal possession. In permissive possession, the developer enters the property on behalf of the owner, not as an independent purchaser.The Tribunal also cited the case of Smt. Lakshmi Swarupa vs ITO (ITA No.2278/Bang/2018), where it was held that granting a license to enter the property does not constitute possession under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee had given only permissive possession, not legal possession, thus Section 53A and Section 2(47)(v) of the Income Tax Act were not applicable.Conclusion:The Tribunal held that the transfer had not taken place during the year under consideration, and thus, capital gain was not assessable in the hands of the assessee for the assessment year 2009-10. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the capital gains assessed were deleted. The other incidental grounds raised by the assessee did not require adjudication. The order was pronounced in the open court on 31st Jan 2022.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found