Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty-free imported inputs cleared by one EOU to another EOU under CT-3 procedure were permissible under Notification No. 52/2003-Cus and the Foreign Trade Policy, and whether duty and penalty could be demanded for such transfer.
Analysis: The imported goods were transferred from one EOU to another EOU under CT-3 procedure with departmental approval. Paragraph 4 of Notification No. 52/2003-Cus permits removal of goods to another export-oriented unit and permits such movement in accordance with the Export and Import Policy. Paragraph 6.15 of the Foreign Trade Policy specifically permits transfer of unutilized imported goods from one EOU to another EOU. The Tribunal also followed earlier decisions recognising that such inter-EOU transfer does not attract duty where the receiving unit is an EOU and the transfer is supported by the prescribed procedure.
Conclusion: The transfer was permissible and no duty was payable. The demand and penalty were unsustainable.