Tribunal rules scholarship concessions not taxable, overturns service tax liability decision

The Tribunal held in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the valuation of taxable service for service tax liability related to scholarship concessions in course fees. The Tribunal determined that the scholarship concession provided by the institute was a bonafide business transaction and did not constitute non-monetary consideration. As a result, the appellants were deemed correct in discharging service tax only on the amount received from students, excluding the concessional portion of the fee. The Order-in-Original was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants.

---

---

Issues:
Valuation of taxable service for service tax liability based on scholarship concession in course fee.

Analysis:
The case involved the valuation of taxable service for service tax liability concerning scholarship concessions in the course fee provided by an institute offering commercial coaching for competitive examinations. The appellants advertised their courses and offered scholarships as part of promotional schemes, providing a percentage concession in the course fee to meritorious students. The Department contended that the scholarship amount should be considered a non-monetary consideration, requiring service tax payment on the normal fee charged, even for students receiving scholarships. A Show Cause Notice was issued, leading to a demand confirmation against the appellant under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994, along with penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 77(2).

The appellant argued that the gross amount charged from students entitled to scholarships constituted the primary fee received, with no additional consideration received, monetary or otherwise. They contended that the scholarship concession was universally available to all qualifying students, as mentioned in the prospectus. Referring to a previous Tribunal order in their favor, the appellant maintained that the matter was not res integra.

The Tribunal examined the arguments and the previous order, emphasizing that the scholarship program was part of a pre-notified scheme aimed at attracting candidates and promoting the institute's business. The Tribunal found that the scholarship concession, as per the declared policy, did not involve non-monetary consideration and was a bonafide business transaction. It noted that the service tax liability would arise on the gross value, which, in this case, did not include the concessional portion of the fee. The Tribunal concluded that the appellants were correct in discharging service tax only on the amount received from students, without considering the concessional portion as part of the gross value, as long as it was a bonafide trade practice.

Consequently, the Tribunal held that the Order-in-Original lacked merit and set it aside, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellants.

---