Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the concessional fee extended under a pre-declared scholarship scheme in commercial coaching constituted non-monetary consideration warranting addition to the taxable value, and whether valuation rules could be invoked to enhance the service tax liability beyond the amount actually received.
Analysis: The scholarship scheme was publicly notified and operated on objective criteria such as merit, sibling benefit, or alumni status. It functioned as a business promotion measure and the appellants accepted service tax on the amount actually collected. On the facts, the concession could not be treated as non-monetary consideration. In the absence of any basis to disallow the declared fee concession as a bona fide trade practice, the gross value for section 67 purposes could not be artificially enhanced by invoking the valuation rules.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the appellants and against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and all appeals were allowed because the scholarship-linked fee concession was held not to form part of the taxable value.
Ratio Decidendi: A pre-declared, publicly notified fee concession granted under a bona fide business promotion scheme does not constitute non-monetary consideration for service tax valuation where tax is discharged on the amount actually received.