Court sets aside order under Section 263 for lack of notice & hearing, directs fresh proceedings

The court set aside the order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to lack of proper notice and opportunity to be heard for CVPL, formerly known as Sadabahar. The court found a violation of natural justice principles and directed the department to conduct fresh proceedings for the Assessment Year 2007-2008, ensuring a fair hearing within three months.

---

---

Issues:
Challenging order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for lack of notice and opportunity to be heard.

Analysis:
1. The petitioners contested an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, alleging lack of notice and opportunity to be heard. They argued that the order was based on incomplete information regarding the change in name from Sadabahar to CVPL, affecting proper service and hearing.

2. The petitioners emphasized that the Commissioner is empowered to reassess orders but must provide the assessee with a chance to present their case. They pointed out that attempting to serve Sadabahar after its transformation into CVPL was not valid, requesting a rehearing after due notice to CVPL.

3. Referring to the Certificate of Incorporation and previous court judgments, the petitioners highlighted instances where similar orders were set aside in comparable situations, strengthening their plea for a fair hearing.

4. The respondents argued that they attempted to serve notice to Sadabahar at its last known address, which was later affixed at the premises. However, the petitioners contended that such service attempts on Sadabahar post its name change to CVPL were improper.

5. The court examined the procedures followed for serving notices under Section 282 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and noted that the department should have been aware of Sadabahar's transition to CVPL. The court found a violation of natural justice principles due to the absence of proper notice and hearing for CVPL.

6. The court concluded that the petitioners promptly approached the court upon learning of the order, and criticized the respondent for continuing to address notices to Sadabahar despite being informed of the name change to CVPL.

7. Consequently, the court set aside the order dated 14th January, 2013, along with subsequent notices. It directed the department to initiate fresh proceedings under Section 263 against CVPL for the Assessment Year 2007-2008, ensuring a fair hearing within three months without unnecessary delays.

In summary, the court upheld the petitioners' claim of inadequate notice and hearing, leading to the order's annulment and the directive for a fresh proceeding with proper adherence to natural justice principles.

---