Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand raised under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules for common input services used in trading activity was liable to be sustained, or whether the matter should be remanded to permit reversal of proportionate credit.
Analysis: The assessee was engaged in manufacture, trading, and export, and the dispute arose on the premise that common input services had been used for dutiable as well as exempted trading activity. It was noted that in an earlier period identical demands had been set aside on the basis that proportionate credit had been reversed. The assessee expressed readiness to reverse the credit if the matter was sent back for that purpose, and the Revenue did not oppose the request. The question whether export was an exempted service and the plea of limitation were left open for reconsideration by the adjudicating authority.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to enable reversal of proportionate credit relating to input services used for trading purposes. The appeal was allowed by way of remand.