Cenvat credit on boarding and lodging charges remanded for fresh factual scrutiny and evidence-based adjudication.

Cenvat credit on boarding and lodging charges was examined on the question of business nexus with output services. Because the appellant had produced invoices and supporting material, and the lower authorities had not addressed that evidence in a reasoned manner, the Tribunal held that the factual admissibility question required further scrutiny. It also noted that allegations of personal use were not verified on the record. The appellate order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication, including consideration of additional evidence and further enquiry.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether Cenvat credit availed on boarding and lodging charges was admissible on the facts placed before the Tribunal. (ii) Whether the matter required remand to the Commissioner (Appeals) for consideration of evidence and further enquiry.

Issue (i): Whether Cenvat credit availed on boarding and lodging charges was admissible on the facts placed before the Tribunal.

Analysis: The credit dispute turned on whether the hotel accommodation expenditure had the requisite nexus with the appellant's output services. The record showed that the appellant had relied on invoices and supporting material to explain the business purpose of the accommodation, while the lower authorities had not dealt with those materials in a reasoned manner. The Tribunal also noted that the allegation of personal use was not supported by verification of the actual purpose of the stay.

Conclusion: The admissibility issue was not finally decided against the assessee on the existing record.

Issue (ii): Whether the matter required remand to the Commissioner (Appeals) for consideration of evidence and further enquiry.

Analysis: Rule 9(5) and Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules place the burden regarding admissibility of credit, and the appellate authority has power to make further enquiry and consider additional evidence where necessary. The Tribunal held that such scrutiny could not properly be undertaken at its own level as a mini-adjudication, and that the Commissioner (Appeals) ought to have examined the evidence and recorded findings. The Tribunal therefore set aside the appellate order and sent the matter back for fresh adjudication.

Conclusion: The matter was rightly remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh consideration.

Final Conclusion: The assessee obtained a remand for reconsideration of the credit dispute on the basis of evidence and further enquiry, and the earlier appellate order was set aside.

Ratio Decidendi: Where admissibility of Cenvat credit depends on factual nexus and the lower appellate authority has not examined material evidence, the matter may be remanded for fresh adjudication with authority to conduct further enquiry and consider the evidence.

---